The dreamed peace that the heralds of pacifism preach is nothing more than the subconscious subjugation of the West to foreign Islamic invaders. It dispenses commentary with the silence of the Europeans in the face of the attacks suffered in recent years, in the complacency of politicians and the civilization itself.
Monthly, news of stolen children, sexually abused women, murdered men, shocks Europe. However, they are becoming less susceptible! It seems that it has already become casual, just another tragedy announced, especially when it comes to news involving ethnic “minorities” and native Europeans. Elitists, invaders and complacent people sacrifice innocent on the altar of the deconstructed world made of glitter and “peace & love.”
The “utopians” fill their mouths to speak about tolerance and love, but where is the love with their compatriots? Tolerance, from the Latin tolerare (support, endure), has become a burden. The world does not live in tolerance, which presupposes stability, but in submission.
They “scream” for rights as well, they want everything from the state but they sacrifice nothing. They are pampered, eternal teenagers incubated. They quickly give up on themselves, they cling to the passions and they demand freedom. But deep down it’s just a pretext for the depraved not to be judged by society. They are more concerned with “sealing” society, with superfluous feminism, than abdicating life for others. They live in the luxury of having everything in their hands, however, this has a price and not only for the “effeminate” (an accumulation of weak individuals who have built the present society weak and susceptible to attacks and invasions) but for all. The political system forces mass immigration, with its politics of tolerance, to the detriment of the population itself that surrenders to the “tools” of the system, such as reality shows, degenerated pop music and soap operas that promote immorality and thus ignores its potential for the understanding of political and historical sciences.
Politicians of either left, center or right-wing, at the most, issue a note of repudiation and sadness in the face of the cultural massacre of Europe. However, when a nationalist emerges from the people, like a spark preceding the fire, rises and claims austerity against immigration, he is immediately branded as radical and too extreme for the soft and docile policies proposed by this current dictatorship of “happiness” in which we live called “liberal democracy “. A nation that prefers anything rather than its people has already failed in every aspect. Unfortunately, few nations resist loyalty to their children.
Should we watch the barbarities in silence? I say to you, we must be intolerant against everything that is a threat to our world. The “moderns” sit and lament what happened (the destruction of Europe) and grieve at the growth of nationalism, saying that we are in an age of retrogrades. Paradoxically, we are reaping the fruits of “progressism” itself supported by the “modernists”. It is the weakness and complacency of the last decades that allow the shedding of blood, of our blood.
“The situation of the domestic animal trails behind the animal of slaughter.” – Ernst Junger
Our history shows us the way: “War, not peace, produces virtue. War, not peace, purges vice. War, and preparation for war, summons all that is noble and honorable in one. It unites him to his brothers and binds them in selfless love, eradicating in the crucible of necessity all that is mediocre and ignoble. ” – Steven Pressfield
Nature taught us from the beginning that life is a constant struggle and pacifism is for utopians. There is no politically correct speech that overpowers physical force. There are no political ideologies that surpass the loyalty of the blood, there are no worldly desires that surpass the duty with our fellow men. Our instinct is fierce and it is based on the will to survive. All contemporary daydreams will be pulverized by our actions.
Oswald Spengler: Is world peace possible?
“The question whether world peace will ever be possible can only be answered by someone familiar with world history. To be familiar with world history means, however, to know human beings as they have been and always will be. There is a vast difference, which most people will never comprehend, between viewing future history as it will be and viewing it as one might like it to be. Peace is a desire, war is a fact; and history has never paid heed to human desires and ideals.
Life is a struggle involving plants, animals, and humans. It is a struggle between individuals, social classes, peoples, and nations, and it can take the form of economic, social, political, and military competition. It is a struggle for the power to make one’s will prevail, to exploit one’s advantage, or to advance one’s opinion of what is just or expedient. When other means fail, recourse will be taken time and again to the ultimate means: violence. An individual who uses violence can be branded a criminal, a class can be called revolutionary or traitorous, a people bloodthirsty. But that does not alter the facts. Modern world-communism calls its wars “uprisings,” imperialist nations describe theirs as “pacification of foreign peoples.” And if the world existed as a unified state, wars would likewise be referred to as “uprisings.” The distinctions here are purely verbal.
Talk of world peace is heard today only among the white peoples, and not among the much more numerous colored races. This is a perilous state of affairs. When individual thinkers and idealists talk of peace, as they have done since time immemorial, the effect is always negligible. But when whole peoples become pacifistic it is a symptom of senility. Strong and unspent races are not pacifistic. To adopt such a position is to abandon the future, for the pacifist ideal is a static, terminal condition that is contrary to the basic facts of existence.
As long as man continues to evolve there will be wars. Should the white peoples ever become so tired of war that their governments can no longer incite them to wage it, the earth will inevitably fall a victim to the colored men, just as the Roman Empire succumbed to the Teutons. Pacifism means yielding power to the inveterate non-pacifists. Among the latter there will always be white men — adventurers, conquerors, leader-types — whose following increases with every success. If a revolt against the whites were to occur today in Asia, countless whites would join the rebels simply because they are tired of peaceful living.
Pacifism will remain an ideal and war a fact. If the white races are resolved never to wage war again, the colored will act differently and be rulers of the world.”
Oswald Spengler, selected essays [paraphrased]
Based on Klaus P. written thoughts